- Mon - Sat: 09:00 - 05:00
Type your paragraph here
Rahat Saleem provides legal consultation concerning alleged violations of fundamental rights, including review of the facts, available records and legal options for seeking appropriate relief.
Fundamental-rights matters may arise where a person alleges that government action, a public-authority decision or another legally relevant act has affected a right protected by the Constitution of Pakistan.
The appropriate legal course depends on the right involved, the person or authority responsible, the available evidence and whether another legal remedy applies.
Clients from Islamabad may arrange a consultation in Rawalpindi, while online document review is available where the relevant records can be assessed remotely.
Fundamental Rights are constitutional protections contained in Chapter 1 of Part II of the Constitution of Pakistan.
They include protections and freedoms relating to matters such as life and liberty, safeguards concerning arrest and detention, dignity, movement, association, speech, religion, property, equality and other constitutionally protected interests.
Whether a particular situation amounts to a violation of a Fundamental Right depends on the facts, applicable law and the nature of the action complained of.
The facts are reviewed to identify which constitutional right is alleged to have been affected.
The person, government department or public authority responsible for the disputed action is identified.
Orders, notices, correspondence and other evidence relevant to the alleged violation are examined.
Available constitutional or other legal remedies are considered according to the circumstances.
Every alleged constitutional-rights violation requires careful review of both the facts and the legal framework.
Rahat Saleem reviews the action complained of, supporting documents and available remedies before advising on the appropriate legal course.
The facts are considered against the Fundamental Rights protected by the Constitution.
Any government decision, administrative action or public-authority conduct relevant to the complaint is examined.
Official documents, notices, correspondence and evidence supporting the allegation are reviewed.
Where appropriate, constitutional relief before the High Court may be considered under Article 199.
Chapter 1 of Part II of the Constitution contains a range of Fundamental Rights.
Depending on the circumstances, a matter may involve rights concerning:
The Constitution provides protection relating to life and liberty according to law.
Constitutional protections include safeguards concerning the dignity of the individual and, subject to law, privacy of the home.
The Constitution provides protections concerning arrest and detention.
Citizens have constitutional protection concerning movement, subject to restrictions imposed by law in the public interest.
The Constitution recognises rights concerning peaceful assembly and association, subject to lawful restrictions.
Freedom of speech and expression is constitutionally recognised subject to the limitations provided by law.
The Constitution provides protections concerning profession, practice and propagation of religion subject to applicable constitutional provisions.
Constitutional provisions address protection relating to property and compulsory acquisition.
The Constitution provides for equality before law and equal protection of law.
The applicability and scope of any particular right should be assessed according to the facts and current constitutional law.
The appropriate process depends on the alleged violation, authority involved and available legal remedies.
Discuss the action or decision complained of, the persons involved and the effect it has had.
Review relevant orders, notices, communications and supporting evidence.
Determine which constitutional provision may be relevant to the grievance.
Consider whether an appeal, representation, tribunal process or another legal remedy applies.
Where appropriate, consider whether High Court jurisdiction under Article 199 may be invoked.
If constitutional proceedings are appropriate, prepare the relevant facts, grounds, documents and relief sought.
The documents required depend on the nature of the alleged rights violation.
Not every matter requires every document. The relevant record should be identified according to the right and action involved.
Overseas Pakistanis may also encounter government or public-authority decisions in Pakistan affecting property, documentation, administrative matters or other legally protected interests.
Rahat Saleem provides online consultation and document review where the relevant records can be assessed remotely.
Whether constitutional proceedings are suitable depends on the nature of the alleged violation and applicable law.
Where constitutional relief is appropriate, the matter may be brought before the High Court through a constitutional petition.
The correct legal framing depends on the facts and the relief required.
Article 199 of the Constitution gives a High Court constitutional jurisdiction in specified circumstances.
It permits a High Court, on the application of an aggrieved person, to issue appropriate directions to a person or authority, including a Government, for enforcement of Fundamental Rights protected by Chapter 1 of Part II.
Article 199 also refers to the availability of another adequate remedy when certain forms of constitutional relief are sought. The proper forum and remedy should therefore be assessed before proceedings are initiated.
Fundamental-rights concerns may arise where government or public-authority action is alleged to interfere unlawfully with a constitutionally protected right.
A review may consider:
Which authority acted
What decision was made
What legal power was relied upon
Which right is alleged to be affected
Whether the action was authorised by law
Whether proper procedure was followed
Whether another remedy is available
What relief is being sought
The constitutional issue should be connected clearly to the actual facts and supporting record.
Not every disagreement with a government decision automatically becomes a Fundamental Rights case.
An administrative decision may require constitutional review where the circumstances raise a genuine constitutional issue.
Relevant questions may include:
Was the authority legally empowered to act?
Was the required procedure followed?
Was the person affected given an opportunity to respond where required?
Was the decision discriminatory or otherwise constitutionally relevant?
Does the action interfere with a protected right?
Is another statutory remedy available?
The appropriate legal route depends on the particular decision and governing law.
Article 199 provides several forms of constitutional relief that may be relevant in appropriate circumstances.
Depending on the case, the High Court may consider directions concerning:
Acts performed without lawful authority
Failure by a public authority to perform a legal duty
Allegedly unlawful custody
Questions concerning authority to hold public office
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights
The availability of any particular relief depends on the constitutional requirements and facts of the matter.
Before constitutional proceedings are started, any other legal remedies should be identified.
Depending on the matter, these may include:
Departmental representation
Statutory appeal
Review proceedings
Tribunal proceedings
Civil proceedings
Another court or administrative remedy
The availability of another remedy can affect the appropriate legal strategy.
Before taking further steps, several questions should be considered:
What right is alleged to have been violated?
What action caused the alleged violation?
Who made the decision or took the action?
What documents support the complaint?
What law or authority was relied upon?
Has any representation or appeal already been made?
Is another adequate legal remedy available?
Which court or forum has jurisdiction?
What relief is being requested?
These issues help determine the appropriate legal route.
Preparation and representation in constitutional matters involving government or public-authority action.
Guidance concerning writ jurisdiction and appropriate High Court relief.
Contact Rahat Saleem, Advocate High Court, for legal consultation concerning alleged violations of Fundamental Rights, government action and possible constitutional remedies.
Clients from Rawalpindi and Islamabad may arrange a consultation, while online document review is available where the relevant records can be provided electronically.
Legally reviewed by Rahat Saleem, Advocate High Court
Advocate High Court | District Bar Rawalpindi
Service & High Court Matters – Rawalpindi
This page provides general information concerning Fundamental Rights and constitutional remedies in Pakistan. It does not constitute legal advice for any particular matter. The existence of a constitutional violation, jurisdiction, available relief and procedural requirements depend on the facts, supporting record, applicable law and current constitutional framework.